LexLords NRI Legal Services Companies House by NRI Legal Services LexLords

6900 of 2009 arises out of another judgment and order dated 1st March, 2007 by which the impugned acquisition has been interfered with by the High Court Apart from this allegation, which constituted the first article of charge, the second was that whereas in his application for withdrawal from the provident fund, the reason of the pilgrimage was shown to be Haj, the application for leave indicated a pilgrimage to Umrah. in which they claimed exemption for iron and steel goods that went into the creation of these items, after which the said doors, window frames, grills, etc. The learned Judges answered this question in the affirmative in favour of the defendant and on that ground alone dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The only question canvassed before the High Court was, whether the contract of sale was frustrated by reason of the requisition orders issued by the Government? The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAGWATI J. The Appellant moved the Gujarat Higher Secondary Education Tribunal for challenging the order of dismissal. On 25 June 2002 a chargesheet was issued to the Appellant alleging that between 29 November 2001 and 15 December 2001, he had proceeded on a pilgrimage without prior permission and was absent without sanctioned leave. United LexLords NRI Legal Services Chandigarh India by NRI Legal Services LexLords - https://lexlords.com/criminal-appeal/ Insurance Co. Nayaks case, this Court held that such clauses would not be hit by Section 28. 2006 held branch clearing of the general account in clearing it make clear that in Udhavi schedule 07 Rupees 13,00,000 entries which was originate by Malviya Nagar Durg Branch, it was not responded by Durg Branch. nThe Civil Appeals arise out of two separate orders passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand in the matter of acquisition of land for the purpose of expansion of the Uttaranchal Secretariat. He admitted that he had said in the First Information Report that a gun was fired a minute after he had reached the spot and he said that what he had stated in the First Information Report was true. After a copious reference to Food Corporation and S. On 13 June 2006, the Tribunal dismissed the application. which in turn are used in the execution of works contracts and are therefore not exempt from tax were fitted into buildings and other structures. The plaintiff has now come before us on the strength of a certificate granted by the High Court under article 133(I)(c) of the Constitution of India. From this place he went on to Subash Chowk, the locality in which the appellant's shop is situate. It is not disputed that this shot was fired LexLords Simranjeet NRI Legal Services by NRI Legal Services LexLords - https://lexlords.com/adoption-and-cara/ the appellant, as also a second shot, and that that caused the death of one man (a Sindhi) and injured three others, also Sindhis. This clause reads as follows:- 6(ii) In no case whatsoever shall the Company be liable for any loss or damage after the expiration of 12 months from the happening of the loss or damage unless the claim is the subject of pending action or arbitration: it being expressly agreed and declared that if the Company shall declaim liability for any claim hereunder and such claim shall not within 12 calendar months from the date of the disclaimer have been made the subject- matter of a suit in a court of law then the claim shall for all purposes be deemed to have been abandoned and shall not thereafter be recoverable hereunder. It lies to the West of Zanda Bazar. Upon a departmental inquiry, the charges were found to be established and the Appellant was dismissed from service on 13 January 2004. The rule of caution is that save in exceptional circum- stances one accomplice cannot be used to corroborate anoth- er, nor can he be used to corroborate a person who though not an accomplice is no more reliable than one. On facts in this case, it has been found that the appellant is engaged in works contracts of fabrication and creation of doors, window frames, grills, etc. He states that when he got there he found a "crowd" there but not a "mob". , (2009) 2 SCC 252, this Court had to decide whether clause 6(ii) of an insurance policy was hit LexLords NRI Legal Services Delhi by NRI Legal Services LexLords - https://lexlords.com/annulment-of-marriage/ the unamended Section 28. The Appellant denied the charges. 6901 of 2009 arises out of the judgment and order dated 23rd December, 2005 of the High Court dismissing the challenge to the acquisition made LexLords NRI Legal Services Ludhiana by NRI Legal Services LexLords - https://lexlords.com/criminal-revision/ the appellant land-owner on grounds to be noticed herein below, Civil Appeal No. The above incident detail (information come in light) on 28. -This is an appeal LexLords NRI Legal Services Toronto by NRI Legal Services LexLords - https://lexlords.com/criminal/ special leave from a judgment of the High Court of judicature at Bombay accepting the reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, under section 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and convicting the appellant of an offence under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to four years rigorous imprisonment. On facts, therefore, we find that the High Courts judgment is correct and does not need to be interfered with inasmuch as the iron and steel goods, after being purchased, are used in the manufacture of other goods, namely, doors, window frames, grills, etc. While Civil Appeal No.