LexLords NRI Legal Services Simranjeet Singh by NRI Legal Services LexLords

NRI legal services - https://lexlords.com/suspension-of-sentence/ , https://lexlords.com/criminal/ - https://lexlords.com/criminal/ . 241 defendant Jain Sabha was at all a sub-lessee under Bharamappa or his heirs. We have gone carefully through the document executed by Bharamappa in, favour of the Jain Sabha. It is clear, therefore, that the suit of 1932 was not a suit for eviction instituted by a lessor against his lessee, nor could the present defendant be regarded as a sub-lessee under the defendants in the earlier suit. This submission was accepted by the High Court in the impugned judgment. "Any law of the State enacted not more than eighteen months before the commencement of this Constitution may within three months from such commencement be submitted to the President for his certification; and, thereupon, if the President public notification so certifies, it shall not be called question in any court on the ground that it contract the provisions of clause (2) of this article, 562. 3 alone and the plaintiff's claim for partition of furniture and brass utensils was dismissed. He contested that the claim for refund can be made only by the manufacturer or his buyer and any enquiry pertaining to unjust enrichment should be restricted only to the manufacturer and his buyer. " The appellant having been charged with offences included in the Notification he was tried by the Special Court with the result I have mentioned. We do not approve the findings of the High Court in this regard. Both in form and in substance it is a deed of gift and not a sub-lease. The High Court rejected the defendant No. The attaching of a condition like that to a deed of gift could not, in our opinion, convert it into a sublease. 76 and 78 of 1946 and 32 and 56 of 1947. conclusive as to the public nature of the purpose of the acquisition and the limitation of the amount of compensation so as not to exceed the market value of the land on December 31, 1946, are ultra vires the Constitution and void NRI Legal Services - https://lexlords.com/restitution-of-conjugal-rights/ 559 (i)inasmuch as art. That is not a collat- eral transaction and even if it were a transaction of that type, it would require a registered instrument for the reasons we have already given nBut what is the 'transaction sought to be proved but the very agreement which the document not merely evidences but, by reason of its own force, creates ? Held, that the provisions of s. Appeals from the Judgment and Decree dated the 2nd day of February, 1950, of the High Court of Judicature at Madras (Satyanarayana Rao and Vishwanath Sastri JJ. There is no dispute about the fact that no NRI Legal Services - http://nrizone.in notification has been issued by the Central Government as contemplated in Clause (f) to proviso to Section 11-B (2) of the Act. ) in Cases Referred Nos. 31(2) of the Constitution made the existence of a public purpose a necessary condition of acquisition, the existence of such a purpose as a fact must be established objectively ; 8 of the West Bengal Act XXI of 1948 making the declaration of the Government. n(a) offences under sections 183, 189, 190, 212, 216 224, 302, 304. The preliminary objection raised on his behalf is that section 470 11 of the Ordinance is invalid in that (a) it offends against article 14 of our Constitution, and (b) it autho- rises illegal delegation of legislative power to the State Government No property, movable or immovable, including any interest in, or in any company owning, any commercial or industrial undertaking, shall be taken sesion of or acquired for public purposes under law authorising the taking of such possession acquisition, unless the law provides for 563 compensation for the property taken possession of or acquired and either fixes the amount of the compensation, or specifies the principles on which, and the manner in which, the compensation is to be determined and given. In our opinion, the first contention of the AttorneyGeneral must fail. IV/81-36, dated December 3, 1985, NRI Legal Services - https://lexlords.com/mediation/ hereby directs that, with immediate effect, any dealer, having his place of business and manufacturing goods in the State of Rajasthan, may claim partial exemption from the tax payable in respect of the sales by him of such goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce by way of reduction at the rate of 50% of the tax so payable on increased sales upto 50% and at the rate of 75% of the tax so payable on increased sales made over and above the aforesaid 50%, in the manner and subject to the conditions as follows:- (1) Such reduction of tax shall be allowed to a dealer only after and in respect of the increase which is effected in the percentage of the quantum of goods sold in the course of inter-State trade or commerce out of the total quantum of goods sold within the State and in the course of inter- State trade or commerce and dispatched to Head Office, Branch Office, Depot or agent outside the State for sale outside the State, during any accounting year as against such percentage during the accounting year 1984- 85. It may be unfortunate that by reason of a pure misdescription, the earlier suit was dismissed against the Jain Sabha, but that is altogether irrelevant for our present purpose. The gift, it seems, Was made for a specific purpose, namely, for construction of a school building upon the site which was to be used for the education of the boys and girls of the Jain community, and it was for this reason that the deed provided that on the contingency of the school being removed from the site or its ceasing to exist, the land would revert to the donor. 1's application for leave to appeal to this court but he succeeded in getting special leave under article 136 of the Constitution. 307,323 to 335, 341 to 344, 379 to 382 384 to 389 and 392 to 402 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (XLV of 1860), as adapted and applied to the United State of Saurashtra, and (b) all offences under the said Ordinance, except an offence punishable under sub-section (6) of section 2 of the said Ordinance, in so far as it relates to the contravention of an order made under clause (a) of subsection (1) of the said section. The ultimate buyer/ consumer will not figure in the scheme of Sections 11-B, 12- A, 12-B and 12-C of the Act.